Hi there I am new to the wiki community and I am really into the show Total Drama. I noticed you are an administrator on this wiki, so my question to you is there any characters I could roleplay in a future season here. If not I understand and thank you for reading this in advance :)
Hey Azure, I'm Welly and its really nice to meet you. And yes there are spots for you to play. In our next season, Heroes Vs. Villains, you can play Alejandro for me if you would like. And there are some contestants in need to subbing in Wild West redo, and Blood Vs. Water. I hope this helps, and I hope you enjoy your time on wikia. Also, if you have any more questions, you may ask me or any of our amazing admins. We will all gladly answer them.
Roleplay time does vary at time, but it is usually every Saturday 5-6 EST. Our RTTI redo rp is every week day at 6 EST. Also there is no roleplay going on at the moment, and you are allowed to go on chat whenever. There is no rules against it.
cause it isn't always a good idea. Everyone has a biased opinions, and theres a reason why we have admins. If all decisions are made my the community, there is no need for admins, but obviously the community is not fit for such responsibilities. There are some things we can allow the community to decide on, but banning someone is not something the community should be deciding. Thats a job for the admins and the single B-Crat of the wiki. We are the users who have the power to do such things and decide such things, as we were chosen for the power position.
And I never said the community isn't important, it obviously is important. But situations like this is an admin situation, where the community should not influence our desicion majorly. I know its helpful to know what the community thinks about Mike, but people do have biased opinions, like Mirnish and Freddie. They have hated Mike from the get go, where people liked him and respected him.
And if we start making every desicion a community thing, its gonna end up terribly. It has before and it will agin. Just look how well the admin elections turned out. There is a reason why there are 5 users who have power to be able to decide things. There need to be mature users who are capable of making desicions that will benefit the wiki and the community, as well as making the hard desicions. We are not simply just gonna let everyone decide to ban someone. That is unfair, and innapropriate. We will keep to ways we have always done before, which has always been successful.
"but people do have biased opinions, like Mirnish and Freddie."
Um yeah everybody has a biased opinion on the matter, we just strongly lean toward him being blocked for his actions that have offended many people on Kik. Even if he denies that the user on kik was not him lets not forget that his behavior on chat has caused many users to feel uncomfortable and annoyed.
Since there is no conclusive evidence of it being him on Kik, I don't think that he deserves an infinite ban, but he does deserve a ban because of his behavior on chat, which leads people to believe that it was him on kik. That can be something the admins discuss because the admins are the ones who need to make the tough decisions based on the maturity that they have displayed.
"which has always been successful"
Says who, the majority of users hate that the admin team gets to make decisions that effect the community as a whole. Sometimes the admins make a decision that go against the majority anyways. I personally do not care, but when you suggest an admin meeting everytime there is an issue it makes other users feel as if their opinion does not matter regardless if that is not your intent.
Also to conclude my amazing counter, you say that this is something that the community shouldn't be deciding, YET and admin created the blog for the community to vote on.
Mike really didn't do anything on chat other than argue when people were making fun of him. He was nice and fine other than that. Just because he annoys you doesn't mean he deserves to be banned and there is a 90% chance that he's not even the kik user.
"caused many users to feel uncomfortable and annoyed."
I never said that the reason he should be banned is because he annoys people, its because of his behavior on chat that leads some people to believe that he may have been the kik user.
Even if he isn't the kik user he has been accused of linking porn in pm, having cursing outbursts at other users, and threatened to end his life over this wiki.
So TDL if this isn't enough for you to believe that he should be banned for an amount of time then I have no clue what will, please read my reasons before assuming that I want him banned because he is annoying.
UHM Welly everyone's opinion is biased naturally even if you are trying to be balanced it'll most likely fail. Invaid point. Alright Welly how is it unfair and inappropriate you are just being oh what's the word biased to your own opinion.
You see what I mean? Also, Welly, admins are also biased, and you are the only admin who disagreed with the whole community deciding thing or spoke out about disagreeing so what does that say?
Ok first of all. The blog was made my one admin user with no other admin having a say in the creation of it. And when I say biased. I mean not one single user thought what s going through Mike head, at home and what led him to do things like that. Mike would have be banned already for considering suicide cause everyone thought it had to only do with the wiki. But obviously 2 Adkins had to step in and help out Mike. Me and Aqua know that Mike has serious issues at hone but no one could consider that and everyone wanted him banned. If everyone hates Mjkeso much why don't u actually maybe change his ways or help him out for once instead of being dead set on getting him banned. Me and Aqua are hardly biased when it comes to admin decisions. We were the only ones to consider what Mike felt and tried helping him. Obviously he didn't listen and does have to pay the consequences. I never said I never agreed to the ban of Mike.
I do care about the community but if the admins constantly let the community decide everything for the wiki. What's the point of having admins then? Cause the wiki is deciding everything for them. Banning a user is strictly admin desicions. All the admins are mature enough to put away their biased opinions and make a mature desicion in his punishment. And give suitable reasons to why he should banned. Cause "creepy and uncomfortable" is very weak cause most users would have been banned now based on a few peoples opinions on others. All the Adkins already agreed mike should be banned. But I'm saying next time the banning of a user is something theadmins should only discuss